Visit the Program Evaluation page. Cautions and Suggestions This article argues that it is still premature to start widespread screening for adverse childhood experiences ACE in health care settings until we have answers to several important questions: The article makes suggestions for needed research activities.
Research "Myths and Facts" pages These pages, and the pages on custody evaluation and the joint custody, contain literally thousands of research citations. The sociological and psychological research on families and child well-being impacts public policy and the issues of child custody in family law.
The research frequently is misrepresented, and mis-cited by mental health professionals, lawyers, forensic psychologists and others, as well as interest groups lobbying for laws. The "facts" on the research myths and facts pages refer to the "fact" of the actual research findings.
Often what is cited instead is the "spin" or speculation in researchers' writeups.
These pages are presented as a commentary on the flimsy rationales of record given for much of current public policy. Also review the other sections pertaining to the issues impacted by the research, such as child custody, parental alienation theory, and other family law issues, as well as the section on therapeutic jurisprudence, which in the family courts is economic opportunism not science under the pretext that engineering family affectional relationships is within the ability of mental health "science" to accomplish this is misrepresentationand moreover, that it is an appropriate goal of the government and court system using the specious rationale that these interventions are necessary or helpful for children's wellbeing while ignoring the many iatrogenic effects on both families and the over-burdened courts.
It is a line-by-line analysis of propaganda techniques, logic errors, and outright fraud. The Lamb and Kelly article is presented in its entirety, interlineated with discussion and commentary, as well as annotations.
The widely-cited paper, Using Child Development Research to Make Appropriate Custody and Access Decisions for Young Childrenis an example of pseudo-science posing as objective scholarship by "researchers" or "scientists". But it's a political position paper advocating without sound basis for doing sofor joint custody for babies and very young children.For Jehovah's Witnesses, an insular culture and archaic rules have created a "recipe for child abuse.".
Attachment and Bonding Child Abuse and Domestic Violence Education and Children's Intellectual Development. Attachment and Bonding Also see subsection on Mother's Rights, Pregnancy and Child Custody in FAMILY LAW. Attachment as a Context for Development: Challenges and Issues by Nicola Atwool SCHOLAR; Attachment Research Bibliography by liz CITATIONS TO RESEARCH.
1) Awareness about women perpetrators of sexual abuse use has greatly increased in recent years. However, sexual contact between children and women is a minority of child-adult sexual contacts and the traditional view of child sexual abuse as a primarily male problem is correct.
- July 24, , Long Beach Independent, 'Child abuse at Pentagon-funded school told'. One of the earliest reports in which Satanism and child abuse were (loosely) combined (in an interesting setting, sounding like a MK-ULTRA offshoot).
Child abuse occurs at every socioeconomic level, across ethnic and cultural lines,within all religions and at all levels of education (Swan, ).Treatment of child sexual abuse isa complex process; however, research suggests that group therapy for abused children iseffective however the impact of group therapy for sexually abused children.
The government's proposed redress scheme for victims of institutional child sexual abuse controversially excludes some victims.